At first, I wondered why I only had 15 images at ISO 800, but it actually only searches your current folder or your indexed folders, and this was just after I started indexing. Typing in ‘800’ detects potential meanings and offers the option of showing all images shot at ISO 800, 800mm focal length, 800-second exposures, or file names containing 800. You can simply type in any parameter you want, and it will immediately provide you with a range of options along with how many images fit each search filter. The search feature is an odd blend of brilliant and frustrating. In OpticsPro it was really nothing more than a glorified file browser, and the PhotoLab isn’t much better, but at least now you can add star ratings, pick/reject flags, and search your library based on a range of shot parameters. I’m glad to see that they’ve improved on the old editor in many ways, although the library management and organization feature still seems neglected. This continues the tradition DxO established with their previous RAW editor OpticsPro. Anyone who shoots a lot of high ISO photos will definitely want to spring for the Elite edition as it offers the fantastic PRIME noise removal algorithm, one of DxO’s pride and joys, as well as a couple of other added benefits. PhotoLab is available in two editions: Essential and Elite, and as you can probably guess, there is a fairly significant price difference between the two: Essential costs $139, while Elite will cost you $219. The only noticeable difference that I saw during my platform comparison was that the mouseover popups on the Windows version contained far more metadata about the photo than the Mac version. I did eventually manage to get the Windows download to complete, and the two versions are effectively the same aside from the usual differences between Windows and Mac style choices. For some inexplicable reason, the Windows version of my download kept stalling repeatedly, despite the fact that the Mac version finished its download without any problems from the same server at the same time. Quick Note: DxO PhotoLab is available for Windows and macOS, but I tested the Mac version in this review. Rather than going back in time and repeating all that work yourself – which sounds super difficult – you can read my reviews and benefit from all that experience right away!ĭxO did not provide me with a special copy of the software in exchange for this review (I used the unlimited free 30-day trial), and they had no editorial input or oversight on any of the content. I’ve used them for work, for my own photography practice, and purely for experimentation. During that time I’ve tested just about every image editor under the sun, from free open-source software to industry-standard software suites. Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve been a digital photographer since the days when you could measure your megapixels with a single digit. Lightroom “plugin” isn’t a useful workflow. What I Don’t Like: PhotoLibrary still lacking key features. What I Like: Excellent noise reduction with PRIME. As a result, PhotoLab is best used as a secondary editing option to supplement an existing workflow rather than replacing your existing one. DxO offers a Lightroom plugin with the goal of allowing users to keep Lightroom as their catalog manager, but conflicts between RAW processing engines prevent this from being a viable solution. PhotoLab includes an updated library management tool, but it still needs a lot of additional features before it’s actually ready to replace your current digital asset manager. For photographers focused on color accuracy, this latest version also includes support for DCP profiles. A number of other excellent automatic adjustments simplify the editing process, and newly-added localized editing tools allow you to fine-tune their results more effectively than in the past. As you might expect from them, PhotoLab provides excellent automatic lens corrections and a truly incredible noise reduction algorithm they call PRIME. PhotoLab is a RAW editor from DxO, a company famous for its precision testing of optical equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |